Constructivism is understood as
knowledge that should be assembled by the learner and cannot be delivered by
the teacher. In other words students learn from hands on experiences that are
centered from the students themselves. However, teachers are able to assist
students by providing a hands-on approach for learning that will increase their
comprehension and retaining of information. In return the students are able to
apply the things they have learned to their everyday lives. It is important to
engage students in ways that will result in the retention of educational
content. And how else can this be done other than meeting them at their level
and interest! Integrating technology into the classroom allows students to use
devices where they can navigate through programs and websites to learn content
in a fun way. They can bypass the information they are already knowledgeable in
and focus on subjects or topics they are not as familiar with. It is evident
that children comprehend more when they are actively engaged and are
participating in things that interest them. Students can only pay attention to
direct lecture instruction for so long before they are overwhelmed and bored. Technology
can include cooperative learning, blogs, hybrid courses, digital boards, e-readers,
interactive learning websites and many others that enhance learning through
tech motivation.
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Monday, October 31, 2016
Behaviorist Learning Theory and Technology Integration
Behaviorism
is an educational learning theory used to create different aspects of instruction
and learning in the classrooms like behavior management, positive
reinforcement, and rewards systems. Behaviorism is also based on developing
modernized instruction like supporting instruction through computers. Behaviorism
learning theory focuses on assuring learning and behavior modification by promoting classroom management. An example of educational
technology for this stimulus response approach is consistently teaching the importance
of trying hard, and allows the teachers and the students to keep up with their
hard work and achievements. For
instance, my son has recently started bringing home a behavior chart that gives
him check marks every 15 minutes. If 25 check marks are received then he will
be able to have 30 minutes of IPad usage. But if the child exhibits any
aggressive behaviors the points will be taken away. This not only encourages
good behavior but it also informs the parents of how the day went because if
the form is signed and returned the next day the student will receive Dojo
bucks. It also helps the teacher keep track of both good and bad behaviors. An
example of behaviorism in today’s classroom that targets computer aided
learning could be the online textbooks and learning programs that go along with
it. Many classrooms no longer use print textbooks with just worded information,
instead, they use interactive learning which is supposed to make instruction
more engaging and comprehensive. This instructional e-book website houses
videos that explain information by subject and include quizzes for students to
test their comprehension of the content. It also has different games to help
study and you can click on different symbols or pictures and learn more about
it. Once an individual takes the quiz they are able to see their results and an
explanation of any wrong answers. This allows students to test their knowledge
before exams and students will be willing to put forth more effort if they are
praised or constructively criticized with the results.
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Educational Technology Philosophy-Draft 1
If you closely look at this generation of education,
you will notice that even though the material is closely related or gives the
same end result, the way it is administered or taught changes from year to
year. Using technology as a teaching method has become more common over the
years. However, relationships can sometimes become impersonal when implementing
technology in the classrooms. I have noticed that educators sometimes rely
solely on technology as a classroom instruction and this takes away from the
relationship building between teacher and student. For example, the Promethean
board is able to read to the students instead of the teacher sitting down and
actually listening to the teacher read an actual print book. For many students
this may be fine but for some it can be distracting and disengaging. Technology
should complement the instruction and not replace it. Also, after speaking with
some friends of mine who are educators, I found out that they are trying to
eliminate handwriting in the classroom. Every child will be given an assigned
laptop and will only be taught typing skills. They have already eliminated
cursive writing. These things will disconnect student from the real world. While it may seem I am leaning more on the nay
side of using technology in the educational setting, there are many reasons why
using it is beneficial.
Technology in the classroom has increased parent
involvement in their child’s education. Some teachers create social media
accounts or a classroom website that gives parents access to their child’s
education. They are able to review homework assignments, ask questions, view
attendance records and check current grades. I have an app for Skyward, a
website that gives me live up to date information regarding my son. The down
side to this is that some parents do not have computers at home but the upside
is many of these programs can be accessed through smart phones.
Wednesday, September 21, 2016
Software and Website Rubric Evaluation
Academic Website
Evaluation Rubric
|
|||||
DIMENSIONS
|
1
POOR
|
2
BELOW AVERAGE
|
3
AVERAGE
|
4
ABOVE AVERAGE
|
5
EXCELLENT
|
GOAL
|
Goal of this web site unclear and confusing.
|
Conflicting themes make site’s goal uncertain.
|
Goal is clear but site contains some unrelated or distracting elements.
|
Clear purpose and goal; some elements seem unnecessary.
|
Goal and purpose of site with no distracting elements.
|
USER FRIENDLINESS
|
Unwelcoming to users.
|
Does not evoke a welcoming message
|
Welcomes visitors but does not appear friendly.
|
Welcoming and appears friendly
|
Exciting, welcoming and very user-friendly.
|
DESIGN
|
Poorly organized; contains obvious errors; loads slowly, difficult to
read.
|
Organization somewhat confusing; some errors; loads slowly
|
Organization acceptable; no obvious errors; loads adequately; easy to
read.
|
Good organization; no errors; loads quickly; easy to read.
|
Excellent organization; error free; loads quickly and clearly; all
elements easy to read.
|
NAVIGATIBILITY
|
Difficult to find and follow site navigation links.
|
Navigation links visible but slightly confusing.
|
Navigation links clear and readily available..
|
Navigation links clear and logical; site map included.
|
Navigation logical and clear; site map and search engine available.
|
AUTHORITY
|
Unclear who the teacher is and what class the site relates to.
|
Teacher name and contact included, but insufficient class information.
|
Teacher name, contact information, and some class information included.
|
Teacher name, contact information, full class information included.
|
Teacher provides all necessary information to student, parent, and
community visitors.
|
DATES
|
No dates evident.
|
Site contains some dates
|
Site contains both creation and update information but no dates related
to class activities..
|
Site contains creation and update information and some dates relating
to class activities.
|
Site contains dates for creation, updates, and all class activities.
|
CONTENT
|
Content limited and lacks relevance to students
and parents.
|
Contents appears relevant, but quantity limited in student needs.
|
Content is adequate in relevance and quantity to
meet student needs.
|
Content is relevant and quantity is sufficient for
student needs.
|
Content is on target and provides excellent coverage
to meet student needs.
|
LINKS
|
Few relevant working links.
|
Adequate number of links but many no longer functional.
|
Sufficient number of links, all functional.
|
A good variety of useful, active links.
|
Links offer connection to a wide variety of excellent sites.
|
DISABILITY ACCESS
|
No
option available for disabled student.
|
Some
pages on the site offer text-only.
|
Site
offers text-only on all pages.
|
Site
offers clear options for disabled.
|
Site
includes options on all pages and links to disability support software.
|
Academic Software
Evaluation Rubric
|
|||||
SOFTWARE
FEATURES
|
1
POOR
|
2
BELOW AVERAGE
|
3
AVERAGE
|
4
ABOVE AVERAGE
|
5
EXCELLENT
|
TEXT
|
Text is excessively technical and/or difficult to follow.
|
Text is generally understandable but not very user-friendly.
|
Text is easy to follow and understand: includes all necessary
components.
|
Clear text that is logical and easy to follow.
|
Very clear, easy-to-read, logical, and complete text.
|
SITE LICENSE
|
No Licensing available.
|
Site licenses are available but limited or expensive options.
|
Site licenses available at reasonable cost.
|
Special, low site licensing pricing for education.
|
Educators may use for free without a site license.
|
INSTALLATION
|
Installation too complex; poor installation instructions
|
Installation somewhat difficult; instruction minimal.
|
Installation process typical; fairly clear
|
Easy to install; clear and understandable instructions.
|
Self- installation; step-by-step instructions included.
|
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
|
No toll-free customer service number available.
|
No online support; phone support available for fee.
|
Online chat and phone support available for modest fee.
|
Online tech support available for modest fee, no charge for phone
support.
|
Online chat and toll-free support available 24 hours/day.
|
GRADE LEVEL
|
Not suitable for intended grade level.
|
Some features unsuitable for intended grade level.
|
Majority of features suitable for intended grade level.
|
Most features appropriate and suitable for intended grade level.
|
All features appropriate and suitable for intended grade level.
|
STANDARDS
|
Does not address school target standards.
|
Few school standards addressed.
|
A majority of the school standards are addressed.
|
Most of the desired school standards are addressed.
|
All school standards are addressed.
|
ACTIVE LEARNING
|
Interaction is passive;
no active learning encouraged.
|
Interaction mostly passive; a few active learning opportunities included.
|
Interaction offers average active learning opportunities;
some activities too passive
|
Good active interaction provided through a majority
of the software.
|
Students are actively engaged during all components
of software.
|
SAVE FEATURES
|
Students cannot interrupt and save work.
|
Students’ work can be saved on an external drive but cannot be reused.
|
Students may save work to continue on it in the future.
|
Automatically saves the students’ work when the program is closed.
|
Both automatically and manually, students’ work can be saved and
restarted at the same point.
|
HARDWARE COMPATIBILITY
|
Works
on relatively few available computers; requires additional hardware.
|
Works
on several machines; requires additional hardware.
|
Will
work on most machines with minimal or no hardware upgrades or additions.
|
Works
on most available machines without hardware upgrades or additions.
|
Works
on all machines available without hardware upgrades or additions.
|
COST
|
High cost relative to features.
|
Somewhat expensive relative to features.
|
Average cost for features offered.
|
Reasonably priced with numerous features for the cost.
|
Special low pricing for educational users for abundant features.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)