Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Educational Technology Philosophy-Draft 1

            Today, in the United States, technology is extremely present in the educational settings. You can walk into a U.S. classroom and witness educators and children utilizing Promethean boards, IPads, laptops and many other technological devices. I believe that students being able to use these devices in the classroom is extremely beneficial to their learning. Especially since so many students have some sort of tech device at home that they actively use like a gaming system, iPad, laptop, computer, or tablet. It engages their minds and gives them the opportunity to learn the way of the new world we live in. It also prepares them for training beyond secondary school as well as the workforce. Computers are used for various reasons in the workplace. Many companies require knowledge of certain program software in order to qualify for the job. These programs could include word processing, graphic design, spreadsheets, and many others. Offering classes like keyboarding or BCIS is a great opportunity for students to get prepared. Many people consider this generation as the generation of technology and it seems as if babies come from the womb knowing how to operate these devices without instruction form adults. I am extremely tech savvy and love using technology. However, after being so heavily involved in my child’s education and sitting in his 3rd classroom, my philosophy on technology in the education setting has split between yay and nay.

If you closely look at this generation of education, you will notice that even though the material is closely related or gives the same end result, the way it is administered or taught changes from year to year. Using technology as a teaching method has become more common over the years. However, relationships can sometimes become impersonal when implementing technology in the classrooms. I have noticed that educators sometimes rely solely on technology as a classroom instruction and this takes away from the relationship building between teacher and student. For example, the Promethean board is able to read to the students instead of the teacher sitting down and actually listening to the teacher read an actual print book. For many students this may be fine but for some it can be distracting and disengaging. Technology should complement the instruction and not replace it. Also, after speaking with some friends of mine who are educators, I found out that they are trying to eliminate handwriting in the classroom. Every child will be given an assigned laptop and will only be taught typing skills. They have already eliminated cursive writing. These things will disconnect student from the real world.  While it may seem I am leaning more on the nay side of using technology in the educational setting, there are many reasons why using it is beneficial.

Technology in the classroom has increased parent involvement in their child’s education. Some teachers create social media accounts or a classroom website that gives parents access to their child’s education. They are able to review homework assignments, ask questions, view attendance records and check current grades. I have an app for Skyward, a website that gives me live up to date information regarding my son. The down side to this is that some parents do not have computers at home but the upside is many of these programs can be accessed through smart phones.
 

 
 

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Software and Website Rubric Evaluation


Academic Website Evaluation Rubric
DIMENSIONS
1
POOR
2
BELOW AVERAGE
3
AVERAGE
4
ABOVE AVERAGE
5
EXCELLENT
GOAL
Goal of this web site unclear and confusing.
Conflicting themes make site’s goal uncertain.
Goal is clear but site contains some unrelated or distracting elements.
Clear purpose and goal; some elements seem unnecessary.
Goal and purpose of site with no distracting elements.
USER FRIENDLINESS
Unwelcoming to users. 
Does not evoke a welcoming message
Welcomes visitors but does not appear friendly.
Welcoming and appears friendly
Exciting, welcoming and very user-friendly.
 
DESIGN
Poorly organized; contains obvious errors; loads slowly, difficult to read.
Organization somewhat confusing; some errors; loads slowly
Organization acceptable; no obvious errors; loads adequately; easy to read.
Good organization; no errors; loads quickly; easy to read.
Excellent organization; error free; loads quickly and clearly; all elements easy to read.
 
NAVIGATIBILITY
Difficult to find and follow site navigation links.
 
Navigation links visible but slightly confusing.
Navigation links clear and readily available..
Navigation links clear and logical; site map included.
Navigation logical and clear; site map and search engine available.
AUTHORITY
Unclear who the teacher is and what class the site relates to.
 
 
Teacher name and contact included, but insufficient class information.
Teacher name, contact information, and some class information included.
Teacher name, contact information, full class information included.
Teacher provides all necessary information to student, parent, and community visitors.
DATES
No dates evident.
 
Site contains some dates
Site contains both creation and update information but no dates related to class activities..
Site contains creation and update information and some dates relating to class activities.
Site contains dates for creation, updates, and all class activities.
CONTENT
Content limited and lacks relevance to students and parents.
Contents appears relevant, but quantity limited in student needs.
 
Content is adequate in relevance and quantity to meet student needs.
Content is relevant and quantity is sufficient for student needs.
Content is on target and provides excellent coverage to meet student needs.
LINKS
Few relevant working links.
Adequate number of links but many no longer functional.
Sufficient number of links, all functional.
A good variety of useful, active links.
Links offer connection to a wide variety of excellent sites.
DISABILITY ACCESS
No option available for disabled student.
Some pages on the site offer text-only.
Site offers text-only on all pages.
Site offers clear options for disabled.
Site includes options on all pages and links to disability support software. 


Academic Software Evaluation Rubric
SOFTWARE FEATURES
1
POOR
2
BELOW AVERAGE
3
AVERAGE
4
ABOVE AVERAGE
5
EXCELLENT
TEXT
Text is excessively technical and/or difficult to follow.
Text is generally understandable but not very user-friendly.
Text is easy to follow and understand: includes all necessary components.
Clear text that is logical and easy to follow. 
Very clear, easy-to-read, logical, and complete text. 
SITE LICENSE
No Licensing available. 
Site licenses are available but limited or expensive options. 
Site licenses available at reasonable cost.
Special, low site licensing pricing for education.
Educators may use for free without a site license. 
 
INSTALLATION
Installation too complex; poor installation instructions
Installation somewhat difficult; instruction minimal.
Installation process typical; fairly clear
Easy to install; clear and understandable instructions.
Self- installation; step-by-step instructions included.
 
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
No toll-free customer service number available.
 
No online support; phone support available for fee.
Online chat and phone support available for modest fee.
Online tech support available for modest fee, no charge for phone support.
Online chat and toll-free support available 24 hours/day. 
GRADE LEVEL
Not suitable for intended grade level.
 
 
Some features unsuitable for intended grade level.
Majority of features suitable for intended grade level.
Most features appropriate and suitable for intended grade level.
All features appropriate and suitable for intended grade level. 
STANDARDS
Does not address school target standards.
 
Few school standards addressed.
A majority of the school standards are addressed.
Most of the desired school standards are addressed.
All school standards are addressed.
ACTIVE LEARNING
Interaction is passive;
no active learning encouraged.
Interaction mostly passive; a few active learning opportunities included.
 
Interaction offers average active learning opportunities; some activities too passive
Good active interaction provided through a majority of the software.
Students are actively engaged during all components of software.
 
SAVE FEATURES
Students cannot interrupt and save work.
Students’ work can be saved on an external drive but cannot be reused.
Students may save work to continue on it in the future.
Automatically saves the students’ work when the program is closed.
Both automatically and manually, students’ work can be saved and restarted at the same point.
HARDWARE COMPATIBILITY
Works on relatively few available computers; requires additional hardware.
Works on several machines; requires additional hardware.
Will work on most machines with minimal or no hardware upgrades or additions.
Works on most available machines without hardware upgrades or additions.
Works on all machines available without hardware upgrades or additions.
COST
High cost relative to features.
 
 
Somewhat expensive relative to features.
Average cost for features offered.
Reasonably priced with numerous features for the cost.
Special low pricing for educational users for abundant features.