Academic Website
Evaluation Rubric
|
|||||
DIMENSIONS
|
1
POOR
|
2
BELOW AVERAGE
|
3
AVERAGE
|
4
ABOVE AVERAGE
|
5
EXCELLENT
|
GOAL
|
Goal of this web site unclear and confusing.
|
Conflicting themes make site’s goal uncertain.
|
Goal is clear but site contains some unrelated or distracting elements.
|
Clear purpose and goal; some elements seem unnecessary.
|
Goal and purpose of site with no distracting elements.
|
USER FRIENDLINESS
|
Unwelcoming to users.
|
Does not evoke a welcoming message
|
Welcomes visitors but does not appear friendly.
|
Welcoming and appears friendly
|
Exciting, welcoming and very user-friendly.
|
DESIGN
|
Poorly organized; contains obvious errors; loads slowly, difficult to
read.
|
Organization somewhat confusing; some errors; loads slowly
|
Organization acceptable; no obvious errors; loads adequately; easy to
read.
|
Good organization; no errors; loads quickly; easy to read.
|
Excellent organization; error free; loads quickly and clearly; all
elements easy to read.
|
NAVIGATIBILITY
|
Difficult to find and follow site navigation links.
|
Navigation links visible but slightly confusing.
|
Navigation links clear and readily available..
|
Navigation links clear and logical; site map included.
|
Navigation logical and clear; site map and search engine available.
|
AUTHORITY
|
Unclear who the teacher is and what class the site relates to.
|
Teacher name and contact included, but insufficient class information.
|
Teacher name, contact information, and some class information included.
|
Teacher name, contact information, full class information included.
|
Teacher provides all necessary information to student, parent, and
community visitors.
|
DATES
|
No dates evident.
|
Site contains some dates
|
Site contains both creation and update information but no dates related
to class activities..
|
Site contains creation and update information and some dates relating
to class activities.
|
Site contains dates for creation, updates, and all class activities.
|
CONTENT
|
Content limited and lacks relevance to students
and parents.
|
Contents appears relevant, but quantity limited in student needs.
|
Content is adequate in relevance and quantity to
meet student needs.
|
Content is relevant and quantity is sufficient for
student needs.
|
Content is on target and provides excellent coverage
to meet student needs.
|
LINKS
|
Few relevant working links.
|
Adequate number of links but many no longer functional.
|
Sufficient number of links, all functional.
|
A good variety of useful, active links.
|
Links offer connection to a wide variety of excellent sites.
|
DISABILITY ACCESS
|
No
option available for disabled student.
|
Some
pages on the site offer text-only.
|
Site
offers text-only on all pages.
|
Site
offers clear options for disabled.
|
Site
includes options on all pages and links to disability support software.
|
Academic Software
Evaluation Rubric
|
|||||
SOFTWARE
FEATURES
|
1
POOR
|
2
BELOW AVERAGE
|
3
AVERAGE
|
4
ABOVE AVERAGE
|
5
EXCELLENT
|
TEXT
|
Text is excessively technical and/or difficult to follow.
|
Text is generally understandable but not very user-friendly.
|
Text is easy to follow and understand: includes all necessary
components.
|
Clear text that is logical and easy to follow.
|
Very clear, easy-to-read, logical, and complete text.
|
SITE LICENSE
|
No Licensing available.
|
Site licenses are available but limited or expensive options.
|
Site licenses available at reasonable cost.
|
Special, low site licensing pricing for education.
|
Educators may use for free without a site license.
|
INSTALLATION
|
Installation too complex; poor installation instructions
|
Installation somewhat difficult; instruction minimal.
|
Installation process typical; fairly clear
|
Easy to install; clear and understandable instructions.
|
Self- installation; step-by-step instructions included.
|
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
|
No toll-free customer service number available.
|
No online support; phone support available for fee.
|
Online chat and phone support available for modest fee.
|
Online tech support available for modest fee, no charge for phone
support.
|
Online chat and toll-free support available 24 hours/day.
|
GRADE LEVEL
|
Not suitable for intended grade level.
|
Some features unsuitable for intended grade level.
|
Majority of features suitable for intended grade level.
|
Most features appropriate and suitable for intended grade level.
|
All features appropriate and suitable for intended grade level.
|
STANDARDS
|
Does not address school target standards.
|
Few school standards addressed.
|
A majority of the school standards are addressed.
|
Most of the desired school standards are addressed.
|
All school standards are addressed.
|
ACTIVE LEARNING
|
Interaction is passive;
no active learning encouraged.
|
Interaction mostly passive; a few active learning opportunities included.
|
Interaction offers average active learning opportunities;
some activities too passive
|
Good active interaction provided through a majority
of the software.
|
Students are actively engaged during all components
of software.
|
SAVE FEATURES
|
Students cannot interrupt and save work.
|
Students’ work can be saved on an external drive but cannot be reused.
|
Students may save work to continue on it in the future.
|
Automatically saves the students’ work when the program is closed.
|
Both automatically and manually, students’ work can be saved and
restarted at the same point.
|
HARDWARE COMPATIBILITY
|
Works
on relatively few available computers; requires additional hardware.
|
Works
on several machines; requires additional hardware.
|
Will
work on most machines with minimal or no hardware upgrades or additions.
|
Works
on most available machines without hardware upgrades or additions.
|
Works
on all machines available without hardware upgrades or additions.
|
COST
|
High cost relative to features.
|
Somewhat expensive relative to features.
|
Average cost for features offered.
|
Reasonably priced with numerous features for the cost.
|
Special low pricing for educational users for abundant features.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment